Bug with houses or no?

[Ospite]

noone MUST to know "things" as u said.. all must to know RULES that written at games net. and follow them. between staff and players can stay only RULES written at gamesnet. nothing else..
without rules written at gamesnet can't be punishment.
and especially if such rule is so simple and they knew about bug..

player can be banned for wrong info in data ..
if player have such responsibility for rules.. same must be and with staff..

well.. with remu funny story.. he's not banned .. but also he can't play ;-) cause in jail.. but without expire time.. same shit i believe and with web.
gms couldnt tell him what rules he broke at forum cause there is no such rule..
and also they can't explain clearly why he's in jail in game.. cause he didn't break any gamesnet rule at gamesnet.. rules here r simple common for all.. and if he wrote in icq word idiot to someone that's not ther reason to "bann" in game .. especially if that guy from staff was so wrong

the most funny thing with remu's equipment.
before jail he gave all equipment back to owners.. and appeared in jail nude ..
few days later Scitols asked staff - where're my items that were in my house in my chest ?
- that's remu's stuff and we seize it
rofl ..
so GMs usualy do what they want.. rules ? useless thing.. when they want they do what they want.

[Amdir]

@ex-ReMU: The GMs are the staff, and the staff make the rules. If a rules not are write on english or not are write on page rules all other place where are write a info is a rule (i mean Codex of Wisdom).

If rules page or info on forum or info in game report no info about a fact, our police is to get the rules on OSI. If OSI dont have any rules about, the staff get AN ARBITRARILY decision, looking other similar rules or description, and make an action. This is UODreams, if you dont like it you can go in other shard

I think my last reponse to you, you have your mentality, but this mentality is not mine, the only difference is who you are a player and i'm an admin

Like i write on icq "bye ReMU"

Amdir

[Ospite]

hahahha
lol
then all bugs in game also the rule. cause server made staff and only staff take responsibility for bugs - not players.

staff > rules > codex > bug
so last rule is a bug that excist. and valid cause it's last
that's u logic
Staff make rules > rules not written > codex doesn't work > BUG WORK - the only one thing that WORK and WRITTEN in scripts is that BUG
VALID ONLY IT..

OSI .. OSI .. we signed under GamesNet rules.. show us where is written that OSI rules > than UOD rules.. nowhere.. so we spit on OSI .

and btw admins that higher than u understand that better than u

[Keffu]

;D Hrhrhr you really think that we dont all know that you are rexmundi?
And again. There was an annoucement that if you have 2 houses the first house will be deleted untill 7 days. Its ones own fault if he tries does it work not. Azazello tried to refresh the house? Maybe he succeed but there wasnt any annoucements that will the house collapse or be deleted by gms. So the house is deleted and thats it. Remu you also speak lots about rules. If ya dont know how to bend the rules dont do it and it seems like you cant o_O
If something is deleted it wont be restored -.- Iv learned that by the hard way.

[Ospite]

where is written that it will be deleted ? lol open ur eyes don't goggle at me.
nowhere..
condemned can't be refreshed.. but here it can be.. bug ? UOD feature.. as DeathStrike
looking in codex ? doesn't work
looking in rules ? no word
checked.. all is ok!

show in codex line that house will be deleted
there only words about collapsing.. lol.. azazellos house was made with a clear conscience..
collapsing - does't mean that will come staff with cannon and destroy the house..
it means that game will collapse because of some kind of script

and btw after collapsing as u know all items fall to the ground.
all content was DELETED.

[Dj_Amix]

ok the only way to stop u from continuing in ur public autohumiliation an rudeness is to say:

YES WE ARE DOING ALL WE CAN TO KICK U OUT FROM THE SHARD,SINCE WE DO NOT WANT PEOPLE LIKE U.....

p.s. YES WE ARE RACIST.....against UNPOLITE AND DISRESPECTFUL PEOPLE.

[Asgards]

Azazello, tell me fairly - did you read the codex of wisdom before you built the house ? Of course you didnt. And where's the difference between "can be refreshed" and "can't be refreshed" it's still illegal. Who cares about refreshes if it MUST collapse in 7 days. So if azazello refreshed the house daily - he used a bug. Also, Rex, have you heard this - "My House - My Rules" ? If you enter your friends house - do you make your own rules there ? Ohh probably you do, because you're rude, rude means uneducated. As I told you before - the door are open, you are free to leave.

[speran]

X Hrhrhr:

There are so many other shards, I'm sure that you don't have anything to keep you here, since everyone dislikes you. If you want to stay at least be polite, because once again, THIS IS A FREE SHARD. NOBODY AT THE STAFF GETS PAID TO LISTEN TO THIS KIND OF BULLSHIT, AND NEITHER DO WE.
It's absolutely idiotic to keep on registering and getting banned, since you only come here to rosik and to be rude.
Maybe you are a nice guy in real life, but this is just a game and we're here to play, while you stay just to bother people, trying to make everything personal.

You can keep on registring and rosiking, but noone wants you here.
It's time to stop beeing a "whining child" and start been a "big boy".

Please go away or be a nice guy, as we all try to be.

X aZaZello:

I'm sorry for you, but shit happens, and you had already been warned and probably knew about it, since nobody owns 2 houses.

[KODE2882]

I didn't wish to write, but if you insist, read

Want I will prove to you, what it is possible to have 2 houses and any more not breaking rules?

Then let's solve a simple task:

Task: It is necessary to have 2 houses more than 7 days not breaking a rule and not using bug, namely:

1. 1 house is automatically updated only. It has the status "Automaticaly" - №1
2. The second house has the status "Condemned" and will be removed (destroyed) later 7 days after installation - №2
One additional condition - you should have a true friend



You establish the second house and wait for 6 days.



In the evening of the sixth day you should transfer the house to the friend
Then your friend there and then transfers the house to you (he does not have necessity to wait 6 days)

If it to make, the house №1 will have now the status "Condemned" and will be removed (destroyed) later 7 days after transfer
And the house №2 will have the status "Automaticaly"



So, you not having broken any rule and not using bug own two houses more than 7 days

The answer: you can have two houses more than 7 days not breaking rules until in rules UOD will not be written - the player can have only 1 house on 1 account

But in this case you risk to lose everything as having forgotten once to carry out this operation, your house 2 will be destroyed
This risk should be realized
BUT IT NOT BUG USE
All within the limits of rules and any

p.s. Check up if doubt

[Ospite]

normal iq - 100
and u have it
nice guys. u absolutely NORMAL

[Keffu]

I didn't wish to write, but if you insist, read

Want I will prove to you, what it is possible to have 2 houses and any more not breaking rules?

Then let's solve a simple task:

Task: It is necessary to have 2 houses more than 7 days not breaking a rule and not using bug, namely:

1. 1 house is automatically updated only. It has the status "Automaticaly" - №1
2. The second house has the status "Condemned" and will be removed (destroyed) later 7 days after installation - №2
One additional condition - you should have a true friend



You establish the second house and wait for 6 days.



In the evening of the sixth day you should transfer the house to the friend
Then your friend there and then transfers the house to you (he does not have necessity to wait 6 days)

If it to make, the house №1 will have now the status "Condemned" and will be removed (destroyed) later 7 days after transfer
And the house №2 will have the status "Automaticaly"



So, you not having broken any rule and not using bug own two houses more than 7 days

The answer: you can have two houses more than 7 days not breaking rules until in rules UOD will not be written - the player can have only 1 house on 1 account

But in this case you risk to lose everything as having forgotten once to carry out this operation, your house 2 will be destroyed
This risk should be realized
BUT IT NOT BUG USE
All within the limits of rules and any

p.s. Check up if doubt

Points from the pictures Im not saying that you have abused a bug. Im just asking that did you read the codex(I have never read that thing myself, not even 1 line O_o) AFTER or BEFORE your house was gone? I bet my ass that you read it after gos you thought that ya found a loophole from the rules and tried to get your items back(Points for that, I think I would have tried something like that myself if my house was deleted ) Anyways your house is gone and thats it. Theres no reason for anyone to post here anymore o_O it wont be restored if I know these italians -,- Just ques how long I tried after my bans..

[Keffu]

normal iq - 100
and u have it
nice guys. u absolutely NORMAL

Call me stupid, but I didnt get this O_o

[Grom09]

*** man, that sucks
sorry that happened,
Strange things do happen in uod

[KODE2882]

Points from the pictures Im not saying that you have abused a bug. Im just asking that did you read the codex(I have never read that thing myself, not even 1 line O_o) AFTER or BEFORE your house was gone? I bet my ass that you read it after gos you thought that ya found a loophole from the rules and tried to get your items back(Points for that, I think I would have tried something like that myself if my house was deleted ) Anyways your house is gone and thats it. Theres no reason for anyone to post here anymore o_O it wont be restored if I know these italians -,- Just ques how long I tried after my bans..

I understand, that a thing to not return any more, but I only try to prove:

If at the player of 2 houses, it not a bug as in game there is a mechanism of removal of the second house. It is necessary to the player to forget only once to update the house (does not matter how as it is written in Codex of Wisdom or as I have described above) the house will disappear 7 days later.
But the player has an opportunity to prolong a life to the house

There would be no rule which I has broken having 2 house. There are realized risks and more than anything

Is not present here any bug use. If I for example would leave somewhere for a week, I how could not keep the second house. And it is correct, therefore as mechanisms of game work.

But if I waste time on updating of the house then mechanisms work too on all of 100 %

I did not play on OSI and never there was, but I am assured, that the same rules because it is logical there operate
And the main thing, anybody in fact for certain has not checked up as it on OSI, simply the administration has conferred and has solved

And tell you: at me two houses - you cry: BUG USE!!!!!!
And it is a little to think a head poorly?

If the administration recognizes, that has made a decision hasty, not having checked up all thoroughly, it will not lead to overflow of world UO by houses, on the contrary, many places will be released, as many will simply forget to update the house

[Amdir]

I REPEAT LAST TIME: House delete is not ONLY because you NOW have 2 houses (FROM FEW MONTHS) but ALSO for PREVIOUS (all about own 2 houses).

The system explained by you dont work because when you transfer a house from A to B the house is condamned (if B have a house) and no transfer are allowed into 7 fays (house decay in this time).
I'm not sure (i check on OSI in few days) but if you have an house, you cannot receive 2nd house (then this is a BUG).

If B dont have house the system is illogic, give the house to your friend and you are coowner...

But you dont use this system, you refresh the house with a BUG.

Amdir

P.S.: a BUG dont concern only staff but also the players, in fact on rules are a "BUG ABUSING" punishment ( -> BAN ).