Pinging gameserver16.gamesnet.it [195.36.6.33] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 195.36.6.33: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 195.36.6.33: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 195.36.6.33: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 195.36.6.33: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 195.36.6.33:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
Originally posted by Kinslayer koper ha la linea in fibra penso.. il server da quello che so sta a torino e lui a milano quindi non pinga praticametne un *****
io sto sul massimo 68ms medio 63ms
Peggio, Koper sta a Milano ed il server sta a Milano .
Koper: linea FW - MIX - Server di UO
Originally posted by sir_gawain diciamo che i ping di kooper sono migliori
linux rulez
[aton@w00fz:~]$ ping 195.36.6.33
PING 195.36.6.33 (195.36.6.33): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 195.36.6.33: icmp_seq=0 ttl=120 time=827.402 ms
64 bytes from 195.36.6.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=120 time=920.295 ms
64 bytes from 195.36.6.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=120 time=873.519 ms
64 bytes from 195.36.6.33: icmp_seq=3 ttl=120 time=809.525 ms
64 bytes from 195.36.6.33: icmp_seq=4 ttl=120 time=674.725 ms
64 bytes from 195.36.6.33: icmp_seq=5 ttl=120 time=523.553 ms
64 bytes from 195.36.6.33: icmp_seq=6 ttl=120 time=527.514 ms
64 bytes from 195.36.6.33: icmp_seq=7 ttl=120 time=557.276 ms
^C
--- 195.36.6.33 ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 523.553/714.226/920.295/152.946 ms
from FreeBSD (Unix).
Linux/Unix is absolutely better than windows, this is known to everybody.
But, if you surf the web with a 56k on Linux, your line will sux much more than a crappy Windows with *DSL, don't you think?
So, i HAVE to quote him:
Originally posted by Sebastian Sorano
yes! if u think he use linux based by looking at that ping I would deem u very noob with pc.
Commenta